To oppose a nomination, write *'''Object''' or *'''Oppose''', followed by your reason(s).A reviewer who specializes in certain areas of the FA criteria should indicate whether the support is applicable to all of the criteria. If you have been a significant contributor to the article before its nomination, please indicate this.
Iscribe nuance candidate assessment full#
To support a nomination, write *'''Support''', followed by your reason(s), which should be based on a full reading of the text.All editors are welcome to review nominations see the review FAQ for an overview of the review process. To respond to a nomination, click the "Edit" link to the right of the article nomination (not the "Edit this page" link for the whole FAC page).In the event that the title of the nomination page differs from this format, use the page's title instead. This will transclude the nomination into this page. For technical reasons, templates that are acceptable are (substituting Number), and edit this page (i.e., the page you are reading at the moment), pasting the template at the top of the list of candidates. Graphics such as Done and Not done slow down the page load time, and complex templates can lead to errors in the FAC archives. It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities this is why the main thrust of the process is to generate and resolve critical comments in relation to the criteria, and why such resolution is given considerably more weight than declarations of support.ĭo not use graphics or complex templates on FAC nomination pages. a nomination is unprepared, after at least one reviewer has suggested it be withdrawn.insufficient information has been provided by reviewers to judge whether the criteria have been met or.consensus for promotion has not been reached.actionable objections have not been resolved.A nomination will be removed from the list and archived if, in the judgment of the coordinators: Consensus is built among reviewers and nominators the coordinators determine whether there is consensus. For a nomination to be promoted to FA status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. The FAC coordinators- Ian Rose, Gog the Mild, Buidhe and Hog Farm-determine the timing of the process for each nomination. An article should not be on Featured article candidates and Peer review or Good article nominations at the same time. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make efforts to address objections promptly. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article before nominating it. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the featured article candidates (FAC) process. Editors considering their first nomination, and any subsequent nomination before their first FA promotion, are strongly advised to seek the involvement of a mentor, to assist in the preparation and processing of the nomination.
All editors are welcome to review nominations please see the review FAQ.īefore nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at Peer review and adding the review to the FAC peer review sidebar. FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria.
Here, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs).
0 kommentar(er)
